A summary of a book by the title of this post was published last month on the African Research Initiative’s Website (an awesome resource), so here’s my summary of that summary. The book by Vanessa Watson (U of Cape Town) and Babatunde Agbola (U of Ibadan) looks at the future of African cities and examines current planning practices and emphasis in the continent. The book has a strong belief that African planners should plan the future based on planning theories that originate in the global South, not the top-down, formalization-centered European and American norms. Rather than perceiving planners as part of the status quo of plans that benefit big business and political elites, the book imagines a proliferation of a network of planning schools in Africa (from the current dearth of only 90 in the continent with 30 of those in Nigeria and 10 in SA) that tailor their curriculums towards addressing inequality through participatory, survey-based planning methods (getting “shoes dirty”) that strive to account for informality as a fact in Africa instead of a nuisance to be eradicated through eminent domain (Makoko, Harare). One interesting fact from the summary was that currently the majority of African city dwellers were born in the city they are living in, which challenges the perspective of African cities as transient hubs for migrants who plan to return to the countryside. The authors critique the current “fanciful” master plans for African urban areas as “unsustainable in the extreme and inappropriate in terms of climate, available infrastructure – particularly power – and affordability.” Like Philip Harrison, in his article “The Edge of Reason,” this new book looks to redeem planners from the image of nefarious technocrats to the liberal, clipboard yielding, muddy boots lifeblood of participatory democratic institutions in Africa. Now to get this new breed of planners jobs and decent pay upon graduation…
Thanks for sharing this! I am working on creating a tool kit for urban planners to help engage with communities. You wrote that the book discusses planning schools that “that tailor their curriculums towards addressing inequality through participatory, survey-based planning methods.” Did the book outline what those specific planning methods would be?
Thanks for reading it! They mention that the new curriculum will incorporate these five themes and will emphasize quantitate reports:
-informality
-access to land
-climate change
-collaboration between planners, communities, civil society and other interested parties
-mismatch between spatial planning and infrastructure planning
But besides that they don’t go much into specifics. Good luck!
Interesting. I will have to read the book. I am trying to determine what the feasibility line is been qualitative and quantitative work for planning practice, and I think that reading that portion of the book might help give me some ideas!
Update: I don’t know why I thought it was a book, but the piece seems to only be a report for the African Research Institute and not a book summary…maybe (hopefully) they’ll flesh it out into a book in the future. Sorry about the confusion.
I’m interested to see what you come up with for your planning toolkit!
Thanks for the clarification. I am interested to see what we produce in the tool kit. Any ideas or case-studies are accepted!